Optimal Sequential Strategies for Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Evaluating Efficacy and Cross-Resistance.

BACKGROUND: The optimal sequential strategy for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in breast cancer remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and potential resistance of second ADC (ADC2) following the first ADC (ADC1) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and HER2-low MBC. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, real-world study enrolled patients with MBC who received at least 2 different types of ADCs in 3 hospitals in China between July 1, 2017 and May 1, 2023. Outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR) for ADC1 and ADC2, progression free survival 2 (PFS2), defined as the time from initiation of ADC2 to progression, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Seventy-nine female patients were included, 64 of whom had HER2-positive disease. The ORR for ADC2 with similar payload of ADC1 was found to be 5.3%. When switching to a different payload, the ORR of ADC2 increased to 22.6%. The PFS2 for ADC2 remained similar regardless of whether the payload was similar or different. Switching to different payload showed a higher ORR in patients with rapid progression and a durable response longer than 6 months (41.2% vs 15.0%). Specifically, significantly longer PFS2 and OS were seen in patients treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd) compared to those treated with disitamab vedotin (RC48) after progression from trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; median PFS2 5.37 months vs 3.30 months, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.93, P = .034; median OS 50.6 months vs 20.2 months, HR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.08-0.91, P = .034). For patients who progressed after T-Dxd, the median PFS2 was 6.05 months for those treated with RC48 versus 0.93 months for those treated with T-DM1 (HR = 0.03, 95% CI 0.002-0.353, P = .0093). Genomic analysis revealed that alternation of retinoblastoma1 was significantly associated with superior PFS. CONCLUSION: The alternation of payload achieves different responses in different settings. T-Dxd followed by RC48 may be a potentially beneficial strategy in HER2-positive disease. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism of cross-resistance.

Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel vs gemcitabine/carboplatin for advanced urothelial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To compare in a phase III trial the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GA) with that of carboplatin plus gemcitabine (GCb) as a first-line treatment for patients with cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment-naive, cisplatin-ineligible patients with mUC were assigned randomly to either the GA (both nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or GCb group (carboplatin area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve of 4.5 on Day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8, every 21 days). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: The trial was terminated early because of slow accrual after 54 patients were enrolled: 26 in in the GA group and 28 in the GCb groups. The median PFS was 6.7 vs 5.9 months for the GA and GCb groups, respectively (P = 0.248). The median OS time was 12.1 vs 10.7 months for the GA and GCb groups, respectively (P = 0.837). The ORR and DCR were 40% vs 46.4% (P = 0.637) and 72% vs 68% (P = 0.188) in the GA and GCb groups, respectively. Patients treated with GA showed significantly lower incidence of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and does reduction and delay. Although peripheral sensory neuropathy was higher in the GA arm, no Grade 3 neuropathy occurred. There was no difference in the PROs between the two groups. CONCLUSION: While not powered for comparison, first-line GA showed similar efficacy and better tolerability and might be considered a rational alternative to GCb.

Effect of chemotherapy alone or combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic genitourinary small cell carcinoma: a real-world retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Genitourinary small cell carcinoma is rare, and has a poor prognosis. However, effective treatment options for this disease are limited. We present a study to assess the efficacy of chemotherapy alone or combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic genitourinary small cell carcinoma (GSCC). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic GSCC from Jan 2013 to September 2022 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The survival and safety profiles were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two GSCC patients were enrolled, which included 20 with chemotherapy plus immunotherapy and 22 with chemotherapy alone. The median follow-up time was 15.13 months (95% CI, 8.84-21.42). The addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy demonstrated no significant difference in median progression-free survival (p = 0.37). However, the median overall survival (OS) was 22.97 and 14.03 months with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, respectively (HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.08-0.55, p = 0.017). Two patients with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy achieved clinical complete remission. The overall response rate for patients receiving chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy was 65%, which was higher in comparison to those treated with chemotherapy alone (50%). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy independently achieved favorable OS. Four patients experienced immunotherapy-related adverse events, with one developing grade 3 hypothyroidism. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with locally advanced or metastatic GSCC, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy might be thought of as a potentially effective treatment option for patients with GSCC.

Phase I study of LZM005 in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

The prognosis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remained unsatisfactory currently, more anti-HER2 agents are needed. Here we report a phase I study that evaluated the safety, activity, and biomarkers of LZM005, a HER2 antibody, used as a monotherapy or in combination with trastuzumab plus docetaxel in patients with HER2-positive MBC. From October 2017 to December 2019, 34 patients received LZM005 (14 monotherapy, 20 combination therapy). No DLT was observed. The common adverse events (AEs) in phase Ia included diarrhea (21.4%), infusion reaction (21.4%), and hypertriglyceridemia (21.4%), while those in phase Ib were leukopenia (85.0%), neutropenia (75.0%), anemia (60.0%), diarrhea (60.0%), and rash/pruritus (50.0%). All AEs were manageable. In phase Ia, partial response (PR) was achieved in one case (1/14, overall response rate [ORR]: 7.1%); the disease control rate was 42.90% (6/14). In phase Ib, 11 patients (55.0%) achieved PR, and eight (40.0%) had stable disease. The ORR was 100% (6/6) in trastuzumab-naive and 35.7% (5/14) in trastuzumab-pretreated patients. Biomarker analysis showed that chromatin remodeling genes KMT2B and BRWD1 were associated with better progression-free survival. LZM005 is well tolerated and shows potent activity in patients with HER2-positive MBC.

Optimal first-line treatment for platinum-eligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Comparison of chemo-immunotherapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy- A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of first-line of immunotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to explore an optimal first-line treatment strategy for mUC patients. METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis between chemo-immunotherapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy in mUC based on randomized trials. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). A fixed-effect or random-effects model was adopted depending on between-study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Three trials involving 3238 patients were included. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with the improvements of OS (HR, 0.85; 95% CI 0.75-0.99), PFS (HR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.71-0.90) and ORR (OR, 1.32; 95% CI 1.07-1.63) when compared with platinum-based chemotherapy, but not with better DCR (OR, 1.07; 95% CI 0.78-1.46). PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone was associated with worse ORR (OR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.17-0.87) and DCR (OR, 0.20; 95% CI 0.16-0.25) when compared with platinum-based chemotherapy while it did not statistically reduce the risk of mortality (HR 0.97 for entire cohort; 0.90 for PD-L1 high cohort). In safety analyses, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) between regimens showed no difference, but the frequency of AEs of grade 3 or severity was higher in chemo-immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with platinum-based chemotherapy, chemo-immunotherapy is associated with significantly improved PFS, OS, and ORR in the first-line therapy for mUC at the expanse of increased toxicity.

Treatment Outcome of Different Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Metastatic Malignant Urachal Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Malignant urachal tumor is a rare subtype of genitourinary cancer. Our aim was to explore the optimal chemotherapy regimens for relapsed or metastatic urachal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 24 adult patients with relapsed or metastatic urachal carcinoma from January 2014 to September 2020 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. We summarized the chemotherapy regimens and classified them as fluorouracil based, platinum based, and paclitaxel based. Nine patients received XELOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) regimens, seven patients received TX (paclitaxel and capecitabine) regimens, and eight of them received chemotherapy including GP (gemcitabine and cisplatin), TP (paclitaxel and cisplatin), TN (paclitaxel and nedaplatin), and tislelizumab. RESULTS: The disease control rate was 75%. Among all patients, one patient treated with XELOX achieved partial remission (PR), while 17 patients showed stable disease. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in all treated patients was 7.43 and 29.7 months, respectively. The patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy presented better PFS than those without platinum (median PFS 8.23 vs. 3.80 months, p = 0.032), but not significant for OS between two groups. There is no significant difference in PFS and OS for fluorouracil-based and paclitaxel-based groups as first-line regimen. Next-generation gene sequencing revealed TP53 mutation and low tumor mutational burden in five out of seven cases. CONCLUSION: The platinum-based chemotherapy regimen is effective for relapsed or metastatic urachal carcinoma.

Role of a Modified Urothelium Immune Prognostic Index in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Anti-PD-1/PD-L1-Based Therapy.

Introduction: The use of antibodies against programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) has improved survival in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. However, reliable and convenient biomarkers of early responses and outcomes are still lacking. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively screened mUC patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy at our institute. A modified urothelium immune prognostic index (mUIPI) based on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was developed to characterize the three groups as good, intermediate, and poor mUIPI. Major observations were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (DCR). Results: We identified 52 mUC patients with a median follow-up time of 29.8 months (95% CI, 26.3-53.2). Low NLR was with improved PFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40, 95% CI, 0.18-0.92; HR, 0.27, 95% CI, 0.11-0.69, respectively). Normal LDH was associated with improved PFS but not OS (HR, 0.22, 95% CI, 0.10-0.52; HR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.34-2.13, respectively). The median PFS for the poor, intermediate, and good mUIPI groups was 1.97 months (95% CI, 1.15 to NR), 3.48 months (95% CI, 1.58 to NR), and 14.52 months (95% CI, 5.75 to NR), respectively (p < 0.001). The median OS for the poor, intermediate, and good mUIPI was 12.82, 18.11, and 34.87 months, respectively (p = 0.28). A good mUIPI was associated with a higher DCR compared to intermediate and poor mUIPI (odds ratio [OR] 7.58, 95% CI, 1.73-43.69; OR, 6.49, 95% CI, 0.14-295.42, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, a good mUIPI was associated with improved PFS in the subgroups of male patients and patients with low urinary tract primary tumors, liver metastases, non-first-line treatment, and monotherapy. Conclusions: mUIPI predicts early responses in mUC patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy.

A Novel Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature Predicts Overall Survival of Breast Cancer Patients.

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death in women, thus a reliable prognostic model for overall survival (OS) in breast cancer is needed to improve treatment and care. Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent cell death. It is already known that siramesine and lapatinib could induce ferroptosis in breast cancer cells, and some ferroptosis-related genes were closely related with the outcomes of treatments regarding breast cancer. The relationship between these genes and the prognosis of OS remains unclear. The data of gene expression and related clinical information was downloaded from public databases. Based on the TCGA-BRCA cohort, an 8-gene prediction model was established with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) cox regression, and this model was validated in patients from the METABRIC cohort. Based on the median risk score obtained from the 8-gene model, patients were stratified into high- or low-risk groups. Cox regression analyses identified that the risk score was an independent predictor for OS. The findings from CIBERSORT and ssGSEA presented noticeable differences in enrichment scores for immune cells and pathways between the abovementioned two risk groups. To sum up, this prediction model has potential to be widely applied in future clinical settings.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for small, lymph node-negative, triple-negative breast cancer: A single-center study and a meta-analysis of the published literature.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with small, lymph node-negative, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) measuring >5 mm (T1b disease), but clinical evidence to support this recommendation is lacking. Thus, the current study aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T1N0M0 (measuring ≤2 cm) TNBC with different tumor sizes. METHODS: The authors retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with pT1N0M0 TNBC who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center. For the meta-analysis, electronic medical databases were searched for all relevant studies regarding the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the target population. RESULTS: Of the 351 enrolled patients, 309 (88%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 42 patients (12%) did not. The distribution by T classification was T1a in 19 patients (5.4%), T1b in 67 patients (19.1%), and T1c in 265 patients (75.5%). Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the patients with T1c disease, but not those with T1b and T1a disease. Meanwhile, there was no difference in RFS noted according to the chemotherapy regimen among patients with T1c disease. Seven eligible studies comprising 1525 patients with T1N0M0 (941 with T1a/bN0M0) were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced the rate of disease recurrence for patients with T1a/b disease as a group, but the population driving that was only patients with T1b disease, not those with T1a disease. CONCLUSIONS: Although the retrospective analysis demonstrated a survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy only for patients with T1cN0 TNBC, the meta-analysis showed it also is beneficial for individuals with T1bN0 TNBC. For patients with T1cN0M0 TNBC, less intensive chemotherapy regimens achieve an excellent survival outcome similar to that of intensive anthracycline and taxane combination chemotherapy.

Pretreatment anti-Mullerian hormone-based nomogram predicts menstruation status after chemotherapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Ovarian function is important for optimizing endocrine treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (eBC). The aim of the study was to determine whether patients' pretreatment levels of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) were associated with menses status after chemotherapy and to build a predictive nomogram model for amenorrhea in women with HR+ eBC. METHODS: Between August 2013 and December 2014, 120 premenopausal patients with HR+ eBC were included retrospectively. The associations among age, prechemotherapy levels of AMH, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH),and estradiol (E2) and the 2-year postchemotherapy menses status were analyzed. We determined the cutoff values of hormone levels by using the biostatistical tool (Cutoff Finder). A novel nomogram was established to predict the 2-year amenorrhea status based on the logistic analysis. Concordance index (C-index) was used to validate the capacity. RESULTS: One hundred nine women (90.8%) experienced amenorrhea after chemotherapy. AMH < 0.965 ng/ml predicted amenorrhea at 2 years (AUC 0.84, sensitivity 74% and specificity 81.8%), independent of age. The predictive nomogram based on age and pretreatment AMH and FSH levels was developed to predict the probability of 2-year postchemotherapy amenorrhea with a C-index of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: In premenopausal patients with HR+ eBC, prechemotherapy AMH concentration was associated with the patient's 2-year amenorrhea status, independent of age. The nomogram model based on age and pretreatment AMH and FSH levels accurately predicted the 2-year amenorrhea status.